CO129-245 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [5-7] — Page 311

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

308

But there is a question connected with this matter in regard to which I should be glad to receive your Lordship's instructions.

It appears from the report of the Acting Superintendent of the Victoria Gaol that the prisoner's conduct has been exemplary, and should he obtain the full number of good marks, which under the Prison regulations can be awarded him, he would be entitled to be released after completing two-thirds of his sentence.

The question then arises whether the China and Japan Order in Council 1865 precludes a prisoner sentenced before the Supreme Court under a law in force in China, but undergoing imprisonment in Hong Kong, from obtaining the benefit of the mark system.

On the one hand, to do so would be, in one sense, to obtain mitigation of the sentence awarded; on the other hand, the prisoner in this Gaol is subject, I presume, to the prison regulations, and his sentence has to be carried out in the same way as like sentences awarded by a Court of this Colony.

These regulations, which have the force of law...

Edit History

2026-05-26 05:06:53 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
308 But there is a question connected with this matter in regard to which I should be glad to receive your Lordship's instructions. It appears from the report of the Acting Superintendent of the Victoria Gaol that the prisoner's conduct has been exemplary, and should he obtain the full number of good marks, which under the Prison regulations can be awarded him, he would be entitled to be released after completing two-thirds of his sentence. The question then arises whether the China and Japan Order in Council 1865 precludes a prisoner sentenced before the Supreme Court under a law in force in China, but undergoing imprisonment in Hong Kong, from obtaining the benefit of the mark system. On the one hand, to do so would be, in one sense, to obtain mitigation of the sentence awarded; on the other hand, the prisoner in this Gaol is subject, I presume, to the prison regulations, and his sentence has to be carried out in the same way as like sentences awarded by a Court of this Colony. These regulations, which have the force of law...
Baseline (Original)
308 But there with this matter. is a question connected in regard to which I should be glad to receive your Lordship's instructions. It appears from the report of the Acting Superintendent of the Victoria Gaol that the, 7 prisoner's conduct has been exemplary, and should be obtain the full number of good marks, which under the Prison regulations can be awarded him, be would be, were he a prisoner condemned by a bart of this Blony, completing on سی L'entence. entitled to be released two Thirds of his The question then arives whether the China and Japan Order in Council 1865 precludes a privoner sentenced before the Supreme Court unde in China, but u undergoing Kin :imprisonment in Hong Kong, from obtaining the benefit of the mark destem. On the one hand to do 20. would be a to obtain, in one sense, mitigation of but the sentence awarded, on the other hand the prisoner. in this Gaol to eabject; I presume, to the prison regulations, and this Rentence had to be carried out in the same way to like sentences awarded by Cure a of this Coloring. These regulations, which have the force the of
2026-05-26 05:06:53 · Baseline
View content

308

But there

with this matter.

is a question connected

in

regard to which

I should be glad to receive your Lordship's instructions.

It appears from the report of the Acting Superintendent of the Victoria Gaol that the,

7 prisoner's conduct has been exemplary, and should be obtain the full number of good marks, which under the Prison regulations can be awarded him, be would be, were he a prisoner condemned

by a bart

of this Blony,

completing

on

سی

L'entence.

entitled to be released

two

Thirds

of

his

The question then arives whether

the China and Japan Order in Council

1865 precludes a privoner

sentenced before the Supreme Court

unde

in China, but u

undergoing

Kin

:imprisonment in Hong Kong, from obtaining the benefit of the mark destem.

On the one hand to do 20.

would be

a

to obtain, in one sense,

mitigation of

but

the sentence awarded,

on the other hand the prisoner.

in this

Gaol

to

eabject; I presume,

to the prison regulations, and this

Rentence

had to be carried out in

the same way to like sentences

awarded

by

Cure

a

of this Coloring.

These

regulations, which have the force

the

of

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.